Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 10:32 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 2:42 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06964828
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-05-14
First Post:
2025-05-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Proof of Concept, Randomized, and Crossover Study, to Assess the Effectiveness of Two Types of Compression Garments in Lipedema
Sponsor:
Isabel Forner-Cordero, MD, PhD
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Proof of Concept, Randomized, Controlled, and Crossover Study, to Assess the Effectiveness of Two Types of Compression Garments (Flat vs Circular Knitted) in the Maintenance Treatment of Patients With Lipedema
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
LipeGar
Brief Summary:
The goal of this prospective randomized crossover experimental study is to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of circular and flat fabric garments in stabilizing lower-limb volume in lipedema. It will assess the effectiveness of the garments and determine any differences between both types of hosiery currently used in routine clinical practice. Participants will be prescribed either circular or flat-knitted pantyhose and wear them daily for 6 months. After 6 months, they will change the type of garment.
Detailed Description:
Lipedema, described by Allen and Hines in 1940, is a syndrome characterized by painful edema in the lower limbs associated with a frequent occurrence of bruises. It mainly affects women and is usually symmetrical.
The management of patients depends on the stage and the presence of edema. In the maintenance phase, the goal is to prevent edema recurrence to avoid an increase in fat deposition in the lower limbs through the use of compression garments.
Currently, there are no guidelines for prescribing compression garments for patients with lipedema regarding the type of garment, fabric, or compression level. Therefore, the prescription by lymphologists is empirical and based on experience.
This study, the first of its kind, aims to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of circular and flat fabric garments in stabilizing the volume of the lower limbs and improving or stabilizing the signs and symptoms of patients with lipedema. The study also aims to determine if there are differences between the two types of garments currently used in routine clinical practice.
In order to provide scientific knowledge to guide these decisions, a prospective randomized crossover experimental study is proposed in patients with lipedema type III, stages 1 and 2, undergoing maintenance treatment with circular compression stockings for a minimum of 6 months. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized to continue receiving a compression garment with the same circular fabric they were wearing or alternatively switch to a compression garment with flat fabric, both for 6 months.
After 6 months, the study goals will be evaluated, and a simple crossover will be performed, switching to the other type of garment for another 6 months. In other words, patients wearing circular fabric garments will change to flat fabric compression garments and vice versa. At the end of the subsequent 6 months, the study goals will be reassessed once more.
To assess the study goals, we will record several variables related to:
* The effectiveness of circular and flat fabric garments
* Patient satisfaction with the garments
* Compliance with garment use
* Patient complaints about the garments
Therefore, patients will be recieve a follow-up visit at 6 months from the baseline assessment and at 6 months after crossover treatment. Garment usage will be assessed through automated calls every 2 weeks during the whole follow-up period.
The management of patients depends on the stage and the presence of edema. In the maintenance phase, the goal is to prevent edema recurrence to avoid an increase in fat deposition in the lower limbs through the use of compression garments.
Currently, there are no guidelines for prescribing compression garments for patients with lipedema regarding the type of garment, fabric, or compression level. Therefore, the prescription by lymphologists is empirical and based on experience.
This study, the first of its kind, aims to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of circular and flat fabric garments in stabilizing the volume of the lower limbs and improving or stabilizing the signs and symptoms of patients with lipedema. The study also aims to determine if there are differences between the two types of garments currently used in routine clinical practice.
In order to provide scientific knowledge to guide these decisions, a prospective randomized crossover experimental study is proposed in patients with lipedema type III, stages 1 and 2, undergoing maintenance treatment with circular compression stockings for a minimum of 6 months. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized to continue receiving a compression garment with the same circular fabric they were wearing or alternatively switch to a compression garment with flat fabric, both for 6 months.
After 6 months, the study goals will be evaluated, and a simple crossover will be performed, switching to the other type of garment for another 6 months. In other words, patients wearing circular fabric garments will change to flat fabric compression garments and vice versa. At the end of the subsequent 6 months, the study goals will be reassessed once more.
To assess the study goals, we will record several variables related to:
* The effectiveness of circular and flat fabric garments
* Patient satisfaction with the garments
* Compliance with garment use
* Patient complaints about the garments
Therefore, patients will be recieve a follow-up visit at 6 months from the baseline assessment and at 6 months after crossover treatment. Garment usage will be assessed through automated calls every 2 weeks during the whole follow-up period.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: