Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 3:37 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06840756
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-07-10
First Post:
2025-01-27
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Blood Transfusion on Patient Outcomes
Sponsor:
Michelle Zeller
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
SexMATTERS RCT
Brief Summary:
Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are selected based upon matching donor and recipient blood group: donor and recipient sex are not considered when selecting blood for transfusion. Hence, transfused patients can currently receive sex-matched and/or unmatched RBCs when transfusions are given. Sex-matched stem cell transplants, and some solid organ transplants, have shown that sex-matching donor to recipient improves patient outcomes. Recent exploratory studies have also suggested that patient outcomes could be improved by sex-matching for RBC transfusion. There is emerging evidence of underlying biologic mechanism(s) to support these observations. This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial and will explore the impact on patients who receive RBC transfusions from donors of the same sex ("sex-matched") compared with donors of the opposite sex ("sex-mismatched").
The trial will study adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit who require an RBC transfusion. Patients will be assigned (through a process called randomization) to receive sex-matched RBCs or sex-mismatched RBCs to determine if there is a difference in mortality between those receiving matched versus mismatched RBCs. The results of this trial could have direct implications on resources, blood inventory, and RBC transfusion ordering practices.
The trial will study adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit who require an RBC transfusion. Patients will be assigned (through a process called randomization) to receive sex-matched RBCs or sex-mismatched RBCs to determine if there is a difference in mortality between those receiving matched versus mismatched RBCs. The results of this trial could have direct implications on resources, blood inventory, and RBC transfusion ordering practices.
Detailed Description:
Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are selected based upon donor and recipient blood group compatibility without consideration of donor and recipient sex. Stem cell transplants, and some solid organ transplants, have shown that sex-matching donor to recipient improves patient outcomes. The Principal Investigator has completed a systematic review/meta-analysis and a 40,000 patient exploratory analysis; both showed a signal of benefit from sex-matched RBC transfusion. Biological findings to support the hypothesis that sex-matched RBC transfusions improve survival in recipients are also emerging.
Controversial results have emerged from observational studies and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) regarding recipient mortality from sex-mismatched RBC transfusions; hence, equipoise exists.
The Principal Investigator completed a multisite pilot RCT that showed feasibility for conducting a large-scale RCT and has helped to inform design for this study proposal. The goal of this research project is to develop a precision transfusion strategy based on sex-matching of blood donor and recipient to minimize adverse effects and improve patient outcomes post-transfusion.
Overall Research Question: In transfused adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), do donor-recipient sex-matched RBC transfusions result in improved mortality compared to sex-mismatched RBC transfusions?
Methods: This study is a superiority RCT with pragmatic features that will occur across participating sites in Canada.
Study population: adult patients (ageā„18) who are hospitalized with admission to an eligible ICU and requiring RBC transfusion.
Intervention: donor-recipient sex-matched RBC transfusions. Comparison: donor-recipient sex-mismatched RBC transfusions.
Primary Outcome: 30 day mortality from time of randomization. Secondary Outcomes: time to death, 30 day in-hospital mortality, 90 day mortality, hemoglobin and creatinine increment, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, number/type of transfused products and cost effectiveness analysis. Subgroup analyses will consider recipient sex, age, transfusion exposure, blood type, admitting diagnosis, baseline hemoglobin/creatinine.
Expertise: The study team is uniquely positioned with extensive knowledge and expertise in transfusion medicine, research methodology, conduct of large pragmatic trials, and biostatistics. The study team will collaborate with Canadian Blood Services and experts in blood utilization, and operational modeling. This study is supported and endorsed by the Canadian Transfusion Trials Group.
Importance \& Outcomes: Anemia is common in critically ill patients; as many as 90% of patients will become anemic by the third day of their ICU admission. Between 20% and 40% of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU will require RBC transfusion; each patient will receive on average 2 to 5 RBC units. The Age of Blood Evaluation (ABLE) study showed a 90 day all cause mortality rate of 35-37% in the transfused ICU population studied. The pilot study reflected similar mortality rates. If providing sex-matched transfusions can decrease mortality, this could translate to high numbers of preventable deaths given that 85 million RBC units are transfused globally each year. If this study finds that donor-recipient sex-matching saves lives, this would require changes at the level of the blood supplier to identify sex on each RBC unit, and changes at the hospital level that would incorporate sex-matching into the selection of compatible blood for each patient.
Controversial results have emerged from observational studies and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) regarding recipient mortality from sex-mismatched RBC transfusions; hence, equipoise exists.
The Principal Investigator completed a multisite pilot RCT that showed feasibility for conducting a large-scale RCT and has helped to inform design for this study proposal. The goal of this research project is to develop a precision transfusion strategy based on sex-matching of blood donor and recipient to minimize adverse effects and improve patient outcomes post-transfusion.
Overall Research Question: In transfused adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), do donor-recipient sex-matched RBC transfusions result in improved mortality compared to sex-mismatched RBC transfusions?
Methods: This study is a superiority RCT with pragmatic features that will occur across participating sites in Canada.
Study population: adult patients (ageā„18) who are hospitalized with admission to an eligible ICU and requiring RBC transfusion.
Intervention: donor-recipient sex-matched RBC transfusions. Comparison: donor-recipient sex-mismatched RBC transfusions.
Primary Outcome: 30 day mortality from time of randomization. Secondary Outcomes: time to death, 30 day in-hospital mortality, 90 day mortality, hemoglobin and creatinine increment, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, number/type of transfused products and cost effectiveness analysis. Subgroup analyses will consider recipient sex, age, transfusion exposure, blood type, admitting diagnosis, baseline hemoglobin/creatinine.
Expertise: The study team is uniquely positioned with extensive knowledge and expertise in transfusion medicine, research methodology, conduct of large pragmatic trials, and biostatistics. The study team will collaborate with Canadian Blood Services and experts in blood utilization, and operational modeling. This study is supported and endorsed by the Canadian Transfusion Trials Group.
Importance \& Outcomes: Anemia is common in critically ill patients; as many as 90% of patients will become anemic by the third day of their ICU admission. Between 20% and 40% of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU will require RBC transfusion; each patient will receive on average 2 to 5 RBC units. The Age of Blood Evaluation (ABLE) study showed a 90 day all cause mortality rate of 35-37% in the transfused ICU population studied. The pilot study reflected similar mortality rates. If providing sex-matched transfusions can decrease mortality, this could translate to high numbers of preventable deaths given that 85 million RBC units are transfused globally each year. If this study finds that donor-recipient sex-matching saves lives, this would require changes at the level of the blood supplier to identify sex on each RBC unit, and changes at the hospital level that would incorporate sex-matching into the selection of compatible blood for each patient.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: