Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-26 @ 12:42 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04154956
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-05
First Post:
2019-11-05
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
SAR408701 Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated, Carcinoembryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 5 (CEACAM5) Positive Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients
Sponsor:
Sanofi
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of SAR408701 Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated, Metastatic Nonsquamous, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients With CEACAM5-positive Tumors
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CARMEN-LC03
Brief Summary:
Primary Objectives:
* Study was designed with multiple primary endpoints analyzed on randomized participants at the time of the cut-off date for each given analysis (progression free survival \[PFS\] and overall survival \[OS\])
* Study success was defined either on PFS or OS
* The primary objective was to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the progression free survival (PFS) when compared to docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)
* The primary objective was to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the overall survival (OS) when compared with docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor.
Secondary Objectives:
* Compared the objective response rate (ORR) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel
* Compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel
* Evaluated the safety of tusamitamab ravtansine compared to docetaxel
* Assessed the duration of response (DOR) of tusamitamab ravtansine as compared with docetaxel
* Study was designed with multiple primary endpoints analyzed on randomized participants at the time of the cut-off date for each given analysis (progression free survival \[PFS\] and overall survival \[OS\])
* Study success was defined either on PFS or OS
* The primary objective was to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the progression free survival (PFS) when compared to docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)
* The primary objective was to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the overall survival (OS) when compared with docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor.
Secondary Objectives:
* Compared the objective response rate (ORR) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel
* Compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel
* Evaluated the safety of tusamitamab ravtansine compared to docetaxel
* Assessed the duration of response (DOR) of tusamitamab ravtansine as compared with docetaxel
Detailed Description:
The median expected duration of study per participant was estimated as median 9 months in docetaxel arm (1 month for screening, 4 months for treatment, and 4 months for the EOT and follow-up visits) and 12.5 months in SAR408701 arm (1 month for screening, 6.5 months for treatment, and 5 months for end of treatment follow-up).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: