Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:18 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 12:46 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03169556
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-10-30
First Post:
2017-05-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients
Sponsor:
Yonsei University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Among advanced intubation equipment for difficult intubation, a lighted stylet (lightwand) is a widely used equipment in cervical immobilized patients. However, a lightwand, which is used blind, is difficult to make midline positioning and can increase airway complications and hemodynamic changes. In contrast, videolaryngoscope can view vocal cord indirectly through camera, however, it requires cervical movement. Therefore, investigator hypothesized that the combined use of video-laryngoscope and lightwand for intubation can improve the efficacy of intubation compared to the use of lightwand alone in cervical immobilized patients.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: