Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:17 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 2:57 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00910156
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2009-05-29
First Post:
2009-05-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Indirect Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
Sponsor:
General Hospital Linz
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Indirect Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Routine Nasotracheal Intubation: a Pilot Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2009-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Comparison of ease and convenience of nasotracheal intubation with the use of the two indirect laryngoscopes, Airtraq or Glidescope, versus the traditionally used Macintosh laryngoscope.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: