Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 8:49 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06836869
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-04-27
First Post:
2025-02-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Modified Tumor-free Techniques Operation to Cervical Cancer
Sponsor:
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Non-inferiority Trial to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Incorporating Modified Tumor-free Techniques Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients With Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
MOTTO
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques (LRH-MTF) works to treat FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer as good as abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). It will also learn about the safety of LRH-MTF. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does LRH-MTF achieve a non-inferior disease-free survival rate at 4.5 years post - operation compared to ARH? What complications do patients have during and after the operation when receiving LRH-MTF? Researchers will compare LRH-MTF to ARH to see if LRH-MTF works no worse than ARH in treating FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer.
Participants will:
1. Undergo either LRH-MTF or ARH as assigned by randomization.
2. Visit the hospital for follow-up according to the study schedule for various examinations including blood tests, imaging studies, and assessment of complications.
3. Complete quality-of-life questionnaires such as EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CX24, FSFI, and FSDS-R at baseline (pre-operation) and specific time points during the follow - up period (post-operation 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4.5 years).
Does LRH-MTF achieve a non-inferior disease-free survival rate at 4.5 years post - operation compared to ARH? What complications do patients have during and after the operation when receiving LRH-MTF? Researchers will compare LRH-MTF to ARH to see if LRH-MTF works no worse than ARH in treating FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer.
Participants will:
1. Undergo either LRH-MTF or ARH as assigned by randomization.
2. Visit the hospital for follow-up according to the study schedule for various examinations including blood tests, imaging studies, and assessment of complications.
3. Complete quality-of-life questionnaires such as EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CX24, FSFI, and FSDS-R at baseline (pre-operation) and specific time points during the follow - up period (post-operation 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4.5 years).
Detailed Description:
A progress report will be conducted within 4 weeks after all participants have completed their 6-month postoperative visit (the 5th visit). The report will be performed by an independent third-party statistical team, which will provide a comprehensive analysis of the safety data, baseline characteristic, and perioperative indicators.
The study will perform one final analysis.
The study will perform one final analysis.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: