Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:10 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 10:56 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05722769
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-10-07
First Post:
2023-01-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
CSTOP Now! Child Sex Trafficking Stops With You
Sponsor:
Ann Coker
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
RCT to Evaluate Bystander-informed CSTOP Now! to Prevent Child Sex Trafficking in Kentucky Middle Schools
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Focus: Intervention \& prevention of child commercial sexual exploitation or trafficking (CST) In Kentucky, familial SU/D increases risk of CST.
Primary goal: Implement and evaluate effectiveness of multi-level bystander-informed program (CSTOP Now!) aimed at Kentucky public middle schools for staff.
Primary goal: Implement and evaluate effectiveness of multi-level bystander-informed program (CSTOP Now!) aimed at Kentucky public middle schools for staff.
Detailed Description:
Randomization will occur at the Kentucky county level among 50 counties with at least 2 middle schools for a middle school-based cluster RCT set in 50 of Kentucky's 120 counties. Middle schools in half (n=25) of the 50 Kentucky counties will be randomized to the intervention condition, while middle schools in the remaining 25 Kentucky counties will be randomly assigned to the attention control. We have selected counties that are similar in population size, demographics (% white, % \<18 years of age, and % living in poverty, using 2019 Census estimates). Within each county, all middle schools (\>200 across 50 counties) will be invited to participate in this RCT.
Participating staff will be emailed a link that will take them to a description of the study. Participation will involve receipt of online training, as randomized at the county level, and completing surveys immediately before receipt of the first training and at the end of each of school terms annually.
Aim 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of child sex trafficking (CST) prevention training implemented among middle school staff randomized, at the Kentucky county level, to change middle school staff:
1. Knowledge of child sexual exploitation and trafficking (hypothesize greater knowledge in Intervention versus Control),
2. Attitudes towards child sexual exploitation and trafficking (hypothesize lower stigma in Intervention versus Control),
3. Willingness and efficacy to intervene (hypothesize greater efficacy in Intervention versus Control),
4. Use of 'bystander' actions to thwart child sexual exploitation and trafficking risk (hypothesize increase actions in Intervention versus Control),
5. Use child sex trafficking screening, referral and reporting (hypothesize increase actions in Intervention versus Control),
Aim 2. Evaluate effectiveness of child sex trafficking mass media intervention (Intervention versus Control), randomized and measured at the Kentucky county-level, based on middle school staff survey data:
1. To increase child sexual exploitation and trafficking screening \& reporting in short term (Years 1-2),
2. Begin to reduce child sexual exploitation and trafficking rates in longer term (Year 3-4) Analyses for both aims will be adjusted for school and county-level attributes
Participating staff will be emailed a link that will take them to a description of the study. Participation will involve receipt of online training, as randomized at the county level, and completing surveys immediately before receipt of the first training and at the end of each of school terms annually.
Aim 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of child sex trafficking (CST) prevention training implemented among middle school staff randomized, at the Kentucky county level, to change middle school staff:
1. Knowledge of child sexual exploitation and trafficking (hypothesize greater knowledge in Intervention versus Control),
2. Attitudes towards child sexual exploitation and trafficking (hypothesize lower stigma in Intervention versus Control),
3. Willingness and efficacy to intervene (hypothesize greater efficacy in Intervention versus Control),
4. Use of 'bystander' actions to thwart child sexual exploitation and trafficking risk (hypothesize increase actions in Intervention versus Control),
5. Use child sex trafficking screening, referral and reporting (hypothesize increase actions in Intervention versus Control),
Aim 2. Evaluate effectiveness of child sex trafficking mass media intervention (Intervention versus Control), randomized and measured at the Kentucky county-level, based on middle school staff survey data:
1. To increase child sexual exploitation and trafficking screening \& reporting in short term (Years 1-2),
2. Begin to reduce child sexual exploitation and trafficking rates in longer term (Year 3-4) Analyses for both aims will be adjusted for school and county-level attributes
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U01CE003394 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |