Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 3:11 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06782295
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-11-14
First Post:
2025-01-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Use of CCK vs PS in Revision TKAs
Sponsor:
Rush University Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Constrained Condylar vs Posterior Stabilized Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.
Detailed Description:
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether a difference exists in clinical patient reported outcomes between CCK or PS bearings following rTKA. A secondary goal of the study is to compare both bearings in survivorship free of revision surgery as well as other surgical complications including instability, in early to mid-term follow-up.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: