Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:25 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:07 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00033150
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2006-04-24
First Post:
2002-04-08
Brief Title:
A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
Sponsor:
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders NIDCD
Organization:
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders NIDCD
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2006-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Brief Summary
Nearly 7 of elementary school children present with difficulties learning and using language Unfortunately language impairments are often long lasting and may have serious social academic and vocational ramifications More than 1 million children receive language intervention in the public schools each year and many more are seen in hospitals and other clinical settings
This randomized clinical trial compares the language outcomes of Fast ForWord to two other interventions computer assisted language intervention without acoustically modified speech and individual language intervention and to the outcomes of an academic enrichment control condition Each year for 3 years children will be randomly assigned to each of the four conditions at three regional sites Austin Texas Dallas Texas and Lawrence Kansas The treatments will be administered in special summer programs The primary research question is which intervention results in the most improvement in the composite language score from the Oral and Written Language Scales Secondary questions include which intervention results in the greatest gains in conversational languagewhich intervention results in the greatest gains 3 and 6 months after training which intervention results in the greatest improvement in auditory perception and which intervention is the most cost effective
The results of the study will have theoretical and practical value Theoretically the study tests the temporal processing hypothesis of language impairment Practically the study will describe and compare the language communication auditory processing and academic outcomes of different language interventions The study will help clinicians and administrators choose the most effective and least expensive treatment for the children they serve
Nearly 7 of elementary school children present with difficulties learning and using language Unfortunately language impairments are often long lasting and may have serious social academic and vocational ramifications More than 1 million children receive language intervention in the public schools each year and many more are seen in hospitals and other clinical settings
This randomized clinical trial compares the language outcomes of Fast ForWord to two other interventions computer assisted language intervention without acoustically modified speech and individual language intervention and to the outcomes of an academic enrichment control condition Each year for 3 years children will be randomly assigned to each of the four conditions at three regional sites Austin Texas Dallas Texas and Lawrence Kansas The treatments will be administered in special summer programs The primary research question is which intervention results in the most improvement in the composite language score from the Oral and Written Language Scales Secondary questions include which intervention results in the greatest gains in conversational languagewhich intervention results in the greatest gains 3 and 6 months after training which intervention results in the greatest improvement in auditory perception and which intervention is the most cost effective
The results of the study will have theoretical and practical value Theoretically the study tests the temporal processing hypothesis of language impairment Practically the study will describe and compare the language communication auditory processing and academic outcomes of different language interventions The study will help clinicians and administrators choose the most effective and least expensive treatment for the children they serve
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None