Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:09 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 8:43 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05561569
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-09-30
First Post:
2022-09-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Air Versus Gas Tamponade in Primary Retinal Detachment
Sponsor:
Benha University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Trial Comparing Air Versus Gas Tamponade in Primary Retinal Detachment
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-09
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Management of primary retinal detachment due to upper retinal break is one of controversial situation that may face ophthalmologists in vitreoretinal subspecialty.
Detailed Description:
There is no single surgical plan for management of primary retinal detachment due to upper retinal break, some surgeons prefer scleral buckling over vitrectomy in cases with no traction over the retinal break, others prefer to perform primary pars-plana vitrectomy with either air or gas tamponade.
In this study we aim to compare the results of air and non-expansile gas tamponade in cases with upper retinal detachment with grade a or b proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
In this study we aim to compare the results of air and non-expansile gas tamponade in cases with upper retinal detachment with grade a or b proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: