Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:33 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-22 @ 7:25 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03070795
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2017-03-10
First Post:
2017-02-17
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Oral Feeding After Cesarean Section in Korle-bu Teaching Hospital
Sponsor:
University of Ghana Medical School
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Oral Feeding After Elective Cesarean Section in a Teaching Hospital in Ghana.
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2017-03
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
study compares the outcomes of feeding mothers early (4 hours ) after cesarean section compared to delayed feeding (on post operation day 1) in terms of gastrointestinal function and maternal satisfaction with the feeding schedule.
Detailed Description:
patients who are scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section are randomised to two groups, one group will be allowed to feed 4 hours after cesarean section while the other group will be fed traditionally by feeding on the first post op day. gastrointestinal signs and symptoms will be measured such as post operative ileus, vomiting, nausea, abdminal distension. other parameters to be measured include time to ambulate out of bed after surgery, time to start breastfeeding after surgery. satisfaction with both feeding regimes will be assessed after surgery and the incedence of wound infecion will be compared between the two groups after two weeks durung the post natal review.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: