Viewing Study NCT00602095


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 1:33 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 9:43 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT00602095
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2008-01-28
First Post: 2008-01-02
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Labour Induction With Misoprostol, Dinoprostone and Bard Catheter
Sponsor: Karolinska University Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Randomised Comparison Between Intravaginal Dinoprostone Intravaginal Misoprostol and Transcervical Balloon Catheter for Labour Induction
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2008-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: LI
Brief Summary: This is a randomised study aimed at comparing the currently most frequently used prostaglandin dinoprostone to two other methods, the cheaper and perhaps more effective prostaglandin misoprostol and a transcervical catheter. 592 women were recruited and randomised to one of the three methods. The main outcome measures were time to delivery, rate of instrumental deliveries and maternal neonatal outcome. Our hypothesis was that misoprostol would be superior to the other methods.

The main finding of our trial was that the catheter showed the shortest induction to delivery interval. There were no differences between the two other prostaglandins. No differences in maternal and neonatal outcome was found
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
KS2007 None None View