Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:58 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 8:26 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07252869
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-11-28
First Post:
2025-05-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluation of Impression Accuracy: Digital Scanner Versus Analog Technique
Sponsor:
University of Milan
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner Versus Analog Impression in Implant Supported Rehabilitations Performed With Flapless Computer-Guided Implantology
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of intraoral impressions obtained using the Trios 3Shape® and Carestream CS 3600™ scanners, as well as traditional analog impressions using polyvinyl siloxane (PVS), in comparison to a gold standard represented by a laboratory scanner in 51 dental models from 42 patients affected by partial edentulism who required at least two implants.
Researchers compare Trios 3Shape®, Carestream CS 3600™ and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) to see if there is a different accuracy.
Researchers compare Trios 3Shape®, Carestream CS 3600™ and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) to see if there is a different accuracy.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: