Viewing Study NCT00876135



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 9:23 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 10:03 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00876135
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2013-05-13
First Post: 2009-04-03

Brief Title: Role of Airway Hyperresponsiveness on Performance in Elite Swimmers
Sponsor: Laval University
Organization: Laval University

Study Overview

Official Title: Role of Airway Hyperresponsiveness on Performance in Elite Swimmers Efficiency of a Bronchodilator to Prevent an Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2013-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness AHR is very high in elite swimmers reaching 80 in certain studies Repeated Chlorine-derivatives exposure may be a major causative factor for its development Asthma diagnosis is generally made on the basis of clinical characteristics The demonstration of a variable bronchial obstruction through positive expiratory flow reversibility to a bronchodilator spontaneous variations of airway obstruction or a positive provocation test methacholine eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea is necessary to avoid false diagnosis Currently asthma treatment in swimmers is the same as in the general population A short-acting bronchodilator is often prescribed to avoid occasional symptoms combined with an inhaled corticosteroid or an antagonist of Leukotriene if asthma symptoms are persistent Previous studies have shown a reduced efficiency for asthma medication in elite athletes compared with non-athletes The specific response to different medications remains to be studied in athletes The effects of a short-acting bronchodilator in swimmers with AHR especially when asymptomatic on pulmonary function and performance have not yet been studied Moreover the significance of a positive bronchial provocation test remains to be studied in asymptomatic swimmers with AHR
Detailed Description: Our hypothesis is that swimmers with a positive bronchial provocation challenge have not necessarily an exercise-induced bronchoconstriction during swimming and the use of a bronchodilator will be unnecessary Chlorine-derivatives exposure may be responsible for a weakness of the epithelium layer but warm and humid atmosphere of the swimming-pools may be protective for the development of a bronchoconstriction Thus we also hypothesis that during a field test outside the swimming pool swimmers will develop an exercise-induced asthma and will need to take a bronchodilator in prevention

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None