Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:56 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 2:59 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05167669
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-04-02
First Post:
2021-11-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pain Relief in Symptomatic Bone Metastases With Adjuvant Hyperthermia MR Guided HIFU
Sponsor:
Sana Boudabbous
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Pain Relief in Patients With Symptomatic Bone Metastases: a Feasibility Pilot Study on Palliative Radiotherapy With Adjuvant Hyperthermia by Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
BM-RT-HIFU
Brief Summary:
Metastatic disease to the bone is a common cause of pain. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard palliative treatment BUT pain improvement is observed in 60% to 80%. Combination of hyperthermia (HT) with radiation is strongly compelling. MR is providing accurate, tissue-independent thermometry for intra-procedural guidance of thermal therapy. In this project we aim to combine in an adjuvant setting mild hyperthermia to EBRT for sustained relief of pain in patients with symptomatic bone metastases.
Detailed Description:
Metastatic disease to the bone is a common cause of pain and other significant symptoms with a detrimental impact into quality of life. Up to 85% of the patients dying from breast, prostate, or lung cancer present bone metastases. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is one of the standard palliative treatment modalities effective in palliating painful bone metastases. Using patient-based evaluation method, pain improvement is observed in 60% to 80% of the patients, with 15% to 40% complete pain relief. Combination of hyperthermia (HT) with radiation is strongly compelling as it is based on principles of classic radiobiology, molecular biology, and tumor physiology. Elevating temperature to a supra-physiological level (between 41° and 43°) shows a complementary action when combined with RT with regard to cell killing. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is commonly used in clinical routine for radiological diagnostic and staging. Moreover, MR is providing accurate, tissue-independent thermometry for intra-procedural guidance of thermal therapy. In this project we aim to combine in an adjuvant setting mild hyperthermia to EBRT for sustained relief of pain in patients with symptomatic bone metastases. Ex vivo studies for the adaptation of existing MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) device were already conducted at University Hospitals of Geneva to the current application demonstrating the high accuracy of the technique for mild hyperthermia treatments. A clinical prospective, interventional, single-center pilot feasibility study will be conducted to assess the clinical application of this technique.
Primary objective
1. Accurate control of spatio-temporal pixel-wise MR thermometry (several hundred pixels): spatial homogeneity of temperature elevation within the tumour and inter-patient reproducibility (expected standard deviation of 0.5°C).
2. Safety and patient tolerance: no adverse effects in surrounding bone and soft tissues, compliance with one-day dual treatment during the first month.
Secondary objectives
1. Complete pain response at 28 days after EBRT + HT based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint definition.
2. Pain assessment for the worst pain related to the treated lesion using the Brief Pain Inventory score at baseline, at day 1, day 7, and 28 days after treatment after EBRT + hyperthermia.
3. Health-related quality of life evaluated using self-administered EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BM22 (bone metastases module) questionnaires at baseline, day 7, and day 28 after EBRT + hyperthermia.
Primary objective
1. Accurate control of spatio-temporal pixel-wise MR thermometry (several hundred pixels): spatial homogeneity of temperature elevation within the tumour and inter-patient reproducibility (expected standard deviation of 0.5°C).
2. Safety and patient tolerance: no adverse effects in surrounding bone and soft tissues, compliance with one-day dual treatment during the first month.
Secondary objectives
1. Complete pain response at 28 days after EBRT + HT based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint definition.
2. Pain assessment for the worst pain related to the treated lesion using the Brief Pain Inventory score at baseline, at day 1, day 7, and 28 days after treatment after EBRT + hyperthermia.
3. Health-related quality of life evaluated using self-administered EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BM22 (bone metastases module) questionnaires at baseline, day 7, and day 28 after EBRT + hyperthermia.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: