Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:56 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 2:04 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06251869
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-05-01
First Post:
2023-12-14
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Electrocoagulation vs. Cold Knife Cutting in Joint Arthroplasty (Electrocoagulation vs Scalpel)
Sponsor:
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Electrocoagulation vs. Cold Knife Cutting in Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis in Knee and Hip Replacement
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
evs
Brief Summary:
Comparison of clinical outcomes of electrocoagulation and non-electrocoagulation techniques in total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery
Detailed Description:
Objectives:
A. To evaluate the effectiveness of electrocoagulation:
* To measure the reduction in intraoperative bleeding volume when using electrocoagulation.
* Analyse the impact of electrocoagulation on surgical visibility and accuracy during implant placement.
B. Comparison of surgical outcomes:
* Investigate the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications, such as incidental vascular-nerve injury, wound infections, deep vein thrombosis, and implant-related problems, in patients operated on with electrocoagulation versus techniques without electrocoagulation.
* Examine the influence of haemostatic technique on the need for blood transfusion during or after surgery.
* Evaluation of long-term functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, including joint stability and range of motion, in both groups.
C. Review of patient recovery and period of hospitalization:
* Analysis of the impact of electrocoagulation on length of hospitalisation, and time to ambulation.
* Assessment of postoperative pain levels and analgesic medication use between the two groups.
* Patients' return to daily activities and overall quality of life after surgery.
D. Comparison of data obtained with other studies conducted internationally.
A. To evaluate the effectiveness of electrocoagulation:
* To measure the reduction in intraoperative bleeding volume when using electrocoagulation.
* Analyse the impact of electrocoagulation on surgical visibility and accuracy during implant placement.
B. Comparison of surgical outcomes:
* Investigate the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications, such as incidental vascular-nerve injury, wound infections, deep vein thrombosis, and implant-related problems, in patients operated on with electrocoagulation versus techniques without electrocoagulation.
* Examine the influence of haemostatic technique on the need for blood transfusion during or after surgery.
* Evaluation of long-term functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, including joint stability and range of motion, in both groups.
C. Review of patient recovery and period of hospitalization:
* Analysis of the impact of electrocoagulation on length of hospitalisation, and time to ambulation.
* Assessment of postoperative pain levels and analgesic medication use between the two groups.
* Patients' return to daily activities and overall quality of life after surgery.
D. Comparison of data obtained with other studies conducted internationally.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: