Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:53 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 8:22 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06201169
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-01-12
First Post:
2023-12-30
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
PEEK Bar Versus Titanium Bar Fabricated by CAD-CAM in Mandibular Hybrid Prostheses: A Comparative Study
Sponsor:
Amr Azab Abd El-Fattah
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Study of PEEK Bar Versus Titanium Bar Fabricated by CAD-CAM in Mandibular Hybrid Prostheses
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
CAD/CAM-fabricated PEEK bar exhibited greater dimensional deviation in comparison to its titanium counterpart. Nevertheless, patients with PEEK bars reported higher satisfaction levels and lower marginal bone loss when compared to those with titanium bars.
Detailed Description:
Fourteen patients with completely edentulous mandibular arch opposing natural dentition were selected and divided into two groups, seven patients in each. All patients received implant-supported hybrid prostheses with a bar fabricated by CAD/CAM milling technique. In group I (control), bar was fabricated from titanium, while in group ӀӀ, the bar was fabricated from PEEK. The evaluation of the study was done at 6 and 12 follow-up periods according to the following: 1- Experimentally by Geomagic (Geomagic, Japan) to detect any dimensional deviation of PEEK bars compared to titanium bars. 2-Clinically by questionnaire to evaluate the patient satisfaction. 3- Radiographically (digital periapical) to measure marginal bone loss around the implants.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: