Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:35 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 7:13 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07000435
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-06-02
First Post:
2025-05-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparative Assessment of Thickness Changes in 3D-Printed vs. Custom-Made Mouth Guards for Children in Contact Sports
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Assessing Thickness Changes Following the Use of 3D-Printed Vs. Custom-Made Mouth Guards to Prevent Traumatic Dental Injuries in Children Practicing Contact Sports: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aims to compare changes in the thickness of traditional and 3D-printed custom mouth guards in pediatric athletes who participate in contact sports. Specifically, it will assess the occlusal thickness changes between both types of mouth guards. The research will involve 56 children engaged in contact sports, and the evaluation will cover occlusal thickness, speech, oral functions, and cost-effectiveness over the course of one yea
Detailed Description:
This randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Cairo International Stadium, involving healthy children aged 8 to 14 who actively participate in contact sports and require mouthguards for safety. Participants must be physically fit and cooperative. With parental consent, they will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups:
Group 1: Receives traditional custom-made mouthguards made from alginate impressions.
Group 2: Receives 3D-printed custom-made mouthguards created using digital intraoral scans and CAD/CAM 3D printing technology.
Primary Outcome: Changes in occlusal thickness will be measured at specific reference points on the occlusal surface using an Iwanson caliper. Measurements will be taken at baseline and again after 3 months.(7. Rossi, G. D., Lisman, P., \& Leyte-Vidal, M. A. (2007))
Secondary Outcomes:
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to mouthguard use, assessed via a structured questionnaire (Vignesh et al., 2023).
Cost-efficiency, evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
after one year. Changes in oral functions and speech, measured with a validated Likert-scale questionnaire (Mat Zainal et al., 2024), administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
The trial aims to assess whether 3D-printed mouthguards offer equal or better protection against orofacial injuries compared to traditional mouthguards
Group 1: Receives traditional custom-made mouthguards made from alginate impressions.
Group 2: Receives 3D-printed custom-made mouthguards created using digital intraoral scans and CAD/CAM 3D printing technology.
Primary Outcome: Changes in occlusal thickness will be measured at specific reference points on the occlusal surface using an Iwanson caliper. Measurements will be taken at baseline and again after 3 months.(7. Rossi, G. D., Lisman, P., \& Leyte-Vidal, M. A. (2007))
Secondary Outcomes:
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to mouthguard use, assessed via a structured questionnaire (Vignesh et al., 2023).
Cost-efficiency, evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
after one year. Changes in oral functions and speech, measured with a validated Likert-scale questionnaire (Mat Zainal et al., 2024), administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
The trial aims to assess whether 3D-printed mouthguards offer equal or better protection against orofacial injuries compared to traditional mouthguards
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: