Viewing Study NCT05744895


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 1:21 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 6:23 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05744895
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-03-25
First Post: 2023-02-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: MAKO Total Knee Artroplasty
Sponsor: Washington University School of Medicine
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Early Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the MAKO Surgical Robot and Triathlon Knee
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of robotically assisted total knee arthroplasty with the MAKO surgical robot using the Triathlon knee system. Results of this study will be compared to those of a previously published cohort of patients from this institution who underwent TKA using non-robotic, manual instruments.

MAKO TKA patients will be given Fitbits and the Focus Motion Knee Brace to capture the data listed in attachment section. The results of this data will be compared to the control group to see if there is or there is not a difference in clinical outcomes with patients receiving Total knee surgery using the MAKO surgical robot versus those who got Total knee surgery without the MAKO robot.
Detailed Description: Research objectives:

The purpose of this study is to determine the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of robotically assisted total knee arthroplasty with the MAKO surgical robot using the Triathlon knee system. Mean weekly VAS pain score during the first 4 weeks is the primary end point. Results of this study will be compared to prospective cohort of patients in the IRB study 201805014 from this institution who underwent TKA using non-robotic, manual instruments

Primary Hypothesis: Patients receiving robotic TKA will have better early recovery, including lower mean weekly VAS pain score for the first 4 weeks postoperatively and higher functional outcome scores, than the manual TKA historical cohort.

Secondary Hypothesis:

Patients receiving robotic TKA will have more accurate component position and alignment than the manual TKA historical cohort.

Potential Contribution: This study would give us a better understanding of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients receiving robotic TKA versus manual TKA. It will identify potential advantages and disadvantages of robotic TKA using the MAKO surgical robot.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: