Study Overview
Official Title:
Tunnelated Peritoneal Catheter Versus Repeated Large Volume Paracentesis for Diuretic Resistant Ascites in Patients With Cirrhosis: An Investigator Initiated, Open, Parallel Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2019-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Slow recruitment and limited funding. The treatment intervention is instituted in clinical practice as and end-stage treatment option at hospitals in Denmark
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Brief Summary:
Insertion of a tunnelated peritoneal catheter (PleurX) allows repeated intermittent small volume fluid drainage at home. The treatment may improve the management of ascites and have a beneficial effect on the quality of life.
This study aims to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of the peritoneal catheter (PleurX) versus repeated large volume paracentesis for patients with cirrhosis and diuretic resistant ascites.
The trial is an investigator initiated, randomised, single blind, parallel arm, controlled trial.
Tunnelated peritoneal (PleurX) catheter versus large volume paracentesis. All patients will receive ciprofloxacin to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
We will include 32 adult patients with cirrhosis Duration of trial 18 months. The total duration of follow up is six months. The primary outcome is paracentesis free survival.
Detailed Description:
Ten percent of patients with cirrhosis develop ascites. In 90% of patients, ascites can be treated with diuretics. The management of the remaining 10% with diuretic resistant ascites is challenging. Symptoms including abdominal pain, dyspnoea, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia have a detrimental impact on the quality of life. Repeated large volume paracentesis provides only temporary improvement of symptoms.
Insertion of a tunnelated peritoneal catheter (PleurX) allows repeated intermittent small volume fluid drainage at home. The treatment may improve the management of ascites and have a beneficial effect on the quality of life.
To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of the peritoneal catheter (PleurX) versus repeated large volume paracentesis for patients with cirrhosis and diuretic resistant ascites.
Investigator initiated, randomised, single blind, parallel arm, controlled trial.
Due to the nature of the intervention and the primary outcome measure, Investigators are unable to conduct the trial with blinding of the patients, the investigators or use blinded outcome assessment.
Tunnelated peritoneal (PleurX) catheter versus large volume paracentesis. All patients will receive ciprofloxacin to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
The study investigators will include 32 adult patients with cirrhosis of any aetiology and diuretic resistant ascites.
Gastrounit, Hvidovre University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, and Centre for Hepatology, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, UK 18 months. The total duration of follow up is six months. The primary outcome is paracentesis free survival. Secondary outcomes include cumulative number of paracentesis, cirrhosis-related complications, safety, quality of life, changes in metabolic and nutritional parameters, circulatory dysfunction, renal function, cardiac output, neuro-humoral changes.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: