Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:04 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 5:08 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04488835
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-08-13
First Post:
2020-07-22
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in on Post-herpetic Neuralgia of the Sciatic Nerve
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Comparative Study Between Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Management of Post-herpetic Neuralgia of the Sciatic Nerve
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background and purpose: Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most frequent chronic complication of herpes zoster, resulting in post- infectious severe neuropathic pain. Due to drug resistance severe pain; patients with PHN suffer from reduced physical activities, social and psychological manifestations as well as decrease in the quality of life. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve.
Methods: In an eight weeks period of treatemnt, 52 patients were randomly and equally assigned into two groups. Both groups received conventional physical therapy treatment protocol. Moreover, group (A) has an additional TENS application and group (B) had PEMFS application. TENS and the PEMFT were applied once daily, three times per week for 20 minutes for each session. Assessment performed pre and post intervention using visual analogue scale (VAS) and estimation of the carbamazepine intake (CMI).
Methods: In an eight weeks period of treatemnt, 52 patients were randomly and equally assigned into two groups. Both groups received conventional physical therapy treatment protocol. Moreover, group (A) has an additional TENS application and group (B) had PEMFS application. TENS and the PEMFT were applied once daily, three times per week for 20 minutes for each session. Assessment performed pre and post intervention using visual analogue scale (VAS) and estimation of the carbamazepine intake (CMI).
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: