Viewing Study NCT04538235


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 10:03 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 11:46 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04538235
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2020-09-04
First Post: 2020-09-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Analgesic Non Inferiority of the Thoracic Bi-block in Comparison With Thoracic Epidural for VATS.
Sponsor: University Hospital, Montpellier
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Analgesic Non Inferiority of the Thoracic Bi-block Combining an Erector Spinae Muscle Plane Block and a Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane Block in Comparison With Thoracic Epidural for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2020-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: ANESSTEVATS
Brief Summary: Video-Assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is the standard treatment for localized lung cancer. However, there is no consensus on analgesic management in patients undergoing VATS.

The aim of the study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of thoracic epidural with that a "Bi-block" combining an Erector Spinae muscle plane Block (ESP) and a Serratus Anterior Block (SAP) in patients undergoing VATS for lung or pleural surgery.

Our main hypothesis is that the analgesic efficacy of the Bi-block, assessed by morphine consumption, is not inferior to that provided by a thoracic epidural during the first 48 hours after VATS. We conducted a age, gender and type of surgery-matched retrospective cohort study in the Department of Thoracic Anesthesia of the Montpellier University Hospital (France).
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: