Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:03 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 10:10 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05823935
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-04-21
First Post:
2023-04-09
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Cuff Closure During LH in Benign Gynecological Lesions
Sponsor:
Mansoura University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Cuff Closure During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecological Lesions
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-04
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To compare vaginal cuff closure via Bakay purse string with vaginal cuff closure via vaginal route with continuous locked suturing after total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign lesions.
Detailed Description:
The objective of the present study is to compare 2 different methods for vaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign lesions regarding operative time, vaginal length, vaginal cuff dehiscene, hematoma formation. The first method is the Bakay purse string and the second is the closure of the vault via vaginal route with continuous locked suturing.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: