Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:00 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 2:58 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04466332
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-09-28
First Post:
2020-07-07
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Two ECG Guided PICC Insertion Techniques
Sponsor:
University of Lausanne
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Two ECG Guided PICC Insertion Techniques, a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of our study is to compare two ECG techniques for guiding Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Cather (PICC) in terms of accuracy of the final position of the catheter tip.
Detailed Description:
One technique uses ECG signal transmission with saline water and allows external catheter length adjustment while the other technique uses a guidewire for signal transmission thus requiring prior catheter length adjustment
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: