Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:52 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 3:08 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00230061
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2010-06-02
First Post:
2005-09-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Hepatitis B Vaccination in HIV-infected Persons
Sponsor:
Erasmus Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomised Open Label Clinical Trial of the Immune Response to Hepatitis B Vaccination in HIV-infected Persons.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2010-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
In this study we compare the efficacy of two different HBV-vaccination schedules in HIV-infected persons concerning immune response and compliance. Short schedule: t=0,1,3 weeks and standard schedule: t=0,1,6 months.
Detailed Description:
It is known that HIV-infected persons are more prone to develop chronic hepatitis B infection when they get infected with this virus. After developing chronic hepatitis B these patients are more likely to get livercirrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (Bodsworth et al.).
Hepatitis B vaccination is available and the vaccine is about 95% protective in preventing immunocompetent persons from developing chronic hepatitis B infection (Lemon). The response on this vaccin is less effective in HIV-infected persons (Carne et al.). Furthermore there is a compliance problem in the standard scheme.
In this study we compare the efficacy of two different HBV vaccination schedules in HIV-infected persons concerning immune response and compliance. A short schedule: t=0,1,3 weeks, in which there are good results concerning immune response and compliance in immunocompetent persons (Saltog et al.) and the standard schedule: t=0,1,6 months. Patients not immune at week 28 will be offered boostervaccination. This consists of double doses at t=0,1,2 months.
800 persons are needed to show non-inferiority with lower margin of 10% of the short schedule in comparison with the control group. Powercalculation is 80%. Randomization is stratified according to CD4 count(CD4 \<200, 200-500, \>500).
The hypothesis of the study is a better compliance and a comparable immune response in the short schedule, through which persons will be protected against hepatitis B in an early stage.
Hepatitis B vaccination is available and the vaccine is about 95% protective in preventing immunocompetent persons from developing chronic hepatitis B infection (Lemon). The response on this vaccin is less effective in HIV-infected persons (Carne et al.). Furthermore there is a compliance problem in the standard scheme.
In this study we compare the efficacy of two different HBV vaccination schedules in HIV-infected persons concerning immune response and compliance. A short schedule: t=0,1,3 weeks, in which there are good results concerning immune response and compliance in immunocompetent persons (Saltog et al.) and the standard schedule: t=0,1,6 months. Patients not immune at week 28 will be offered boostervaccination. This consists of double doses at t=0,1,2 months.
800 persons are needed to show non-inferiority with lower margin of 10% of the short schedule in comparison with the control group. Powercalculation is 80%. Randomization is stratified according to CD4 count(CD4 \<200, 200-500, \>500).
The hypothesis of the study is a better compliance and a comparable immune response in the short schedule, through which persons will be protected against hepatitis B in an early stage.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: