Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:54 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 4:19 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03207932
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-11-10
First Post:
2017-07-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for CVC Catheterisation:
Sponsor:
University of Pisa
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for Succlavic and Femoral Vein Catheterisation: an Observational Prospective Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
anatomical landmarks on the body surface were used to insert central vein catheter. However, ultrasound technique is emerging as a new technique for vein catheterisation. For subclavian and femoral vein catheterisation, up to now, there is a lack of evidence of the superiority of one technique over the other.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: