Viewing Study NCT06920732


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 9:48 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-02 @ 3:22 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT06920732
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2025-04-10
First Post: 2025-03-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparative Efficacy of 3L and 2L Integrated Techniques for Gynecologic Cancer-related Lower Extremity Lymphedema: a Retrospective Study
Sponsor: Zunyi Medical College
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparative Efficacy of 3L and 2L Integrated Techniques for Gynecologic Cancer-related Lower Extremity Lymphedema: a Retrospective Study
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2025-04
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this retrospective study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of 3L versus 2L integrated techniques in patients with gynecologic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema (GCR-LEL). The main research question is:

Do 3L integrated techniques provide superior long-term outcomes in reducing lower extremity lymphedema compared to 2L techniques in patients with GCR-LEL?

Medical records of patients who have received either 3L or 2L integrated interventions as part of their routine clinical management for GCR-LEL were reviewed and analyzed to assess treatment outcomes over an extended follow-up period.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: