Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:48 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 6:42 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04905732
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-10-14
First Post:
2021-02-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Nasal High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (NHFOV) for Ventilated Newborn Infants With BPD
Sponsor:
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Nasal High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (NHFOV) vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure(NCPAP) for Ventilated Newborn Infants With BPD: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-10
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Invasive ventilation(IV) remains one key cornerstone to reduce neonatal mortality for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome(RDS) and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). However, it is also related to increased risks of ventilator-associated lung injury and escalation of pulmonary inflammation, and which finally result in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Early weaning from IV in newborn infants with BPD is therefore a key procedure to reduce these risks above.
Detailed Description:
Supplying with the combined advantages of NCPAP and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) with high carbon dioxide(CO2) removal, no need for synchronisation, non-invasion, less volume/barotraumas, and increased functional residual capacity, nasal HFOV(NHFOV) was considered as a strengthened version of NCPAP. Furthermore, the superimposed oscillations of NHFOV could avoid gas-trapping, and allowed to obviously up-regulate mean airway pressure (MAP) more than NCPAP. Thus, NHFOV might be more beneficial as post-extubation respiratory support strategy to avoid re-intubation and subsequent complications and/or sequelae as compared with NCPAP in preterm infants. Nowadays, NHFOV was increasingly used in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) around the world due to its convenient operation. A retrospective review has reported the beneficial effects of NHFOV in preterm infants as a remedial measure after failing to other noninvasive modes, including reducing the number of apneas, bradycardias or oxygen desaturations. However, there were rare randomized controlled studies comparing NHFOV with NCPAP in preterm infants with BPD.
We have found that NHFOV is superior to NCPAP in avoiding re-intubation in very preterm infants with the first extubation. The purpose of the present study was to compare NHFOV with NCPAP as post-extubation respiratory support strategies on the need for endotracheal ventilation, as well as pressure of CO2(PCO2) level in preterm infants with BPD.
We have found that NHFOV is superior to NCPAP in avoiding re-intubation in very preterm infants with the first extubation. The purpose of the present study was to compare NHFOV with NCPAP as post-extubation respiratory support strategies on the need for endotracheal ventilation, as well as pressure of CO2(PCO2) level in preterm infants with BPD.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: