Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:45 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 7:25 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03412032
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-02-05
First Post:
2017-12-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses
Sponsor:
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Several approaches for summative assessment during Advanced Life Support courses are used. The most commonly used method during European Resuscitation (ERC) Council Life Support Courses is that 1 instructor is miming a whole team, and the candidate has to lead this "team" through a scenario; another variant of the summative assessment (mainly used by American Heart Association (AHA) Courses) is with a group of students, where one student is the team leader to be assessed and the others are his team not being assessed. The second approach might be more realistic; however there is no evidence around with regard to effectiveness (pass/fail rate, ability to test non-technical skills (NTS)) or participant/assessor satisfaction.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: