Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:45 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 7:25 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04583332
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-04-02
First Post:
2020-10-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy of AAC for Functional Communication
Sponsor:
Riphah International University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy of Using Augmentative Alternative Communication for Functional Communication in Group Activities
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
There is a considerable number children who are unable to speak, and our currently not being provided with any AAC options in their therapeutic facilities. The study aims to identify the current practice being employed with these children and then provide an AAC intervention for choice making with in group activities in the existing system, where the child is enrolled. Currently there is no indigenous evidence of AAC being employed effectively with these children. A pre- assessment will be carried out to establish the level of communication of the children. Intervention will be provided in a group for 6 weeks, three days a week, as these children already attend these groups.
Detailed Description:
The study is a novel approach to intervention in Pakistan. There are currently no such studies conducted on intervention using AAC use in Pakistan. The objective of the the study are as follows
1. To compare establish current practices with AAC for choice making in group activities.
2. To determine the frequency of choice making in structured group activities.
Hypothesis:
Null Hypothesis:
The use of augmentative alternative communication does not increase functional communication in group activities.
Alternative Hypothesis:
The use of augmentative alternative communication increases functional communication in group activities.
Study Setting: Step to Learn School
Assessment: An assessment will be carried out using the online Communication Matrix to establish baseline communication skills of all the children. The children will also be assessed informally for their current means of communication in existing group activity at baseline, mid level (3 weeks) and at the end of the study (6 weeks).
Intervention: Intervention will (3 days a week for 6 weeks) be provided through objects, picture cards placed on a choice board. The choice will be given for Rhymes, Individual Rhymes \& Sensory objects. Auditory, visual and tactile prompts will be provided.
1. To compare establish current practices with AAC for choice making in group activities.
2. To determine the frequency of choice making in structured group activities.
Hypothesis:
Null Hypothesis:
The use of augmentative alternative communication does not increase functional communication in group activities.
Alternative Hypothesis:
The use of augmentative alternative communication increases functional communication in group activities.
Study Setting: Step to Learn School
Assessment: An assessment will be carried out using the online Communication Matrix to establish baseline communication skills of all the children. The children will also be assessed informally for their current means of communication in existing group activity at baseline, mid level (3 weeks) and at the end of the study (6 weeks).
Intervention: Intervention will (3 days a week for 6 weeks) be provided through objects, picture cards placed on a choice board. The choice will be given for Rhymes, Individual Rhymes \& Sensory objects. Auditory, visual and tactile prompts will be provided.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: