Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:40 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 1:20 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06828432
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-26
First Post:
2025-01-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
CTICU Device Study CRUISE
Sponsor:
Hernando Gomez
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Validation of Three Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems for Determining Measures of Volume Responsiveness, Ventriculo-arterial Coupling and Cardiac Output
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CRUISE
Brief Summary:
The goal of this study evaluate three novel, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved devices currently used to monitor blood pressure and the amount of blood that the heart pumps during each beat.
These devices are the ClearSight (Edwards Life Sciences), CareTaker (CareTaker Medical) and CNAP (CNS Systems). These devices measure blood pressure, how much blood the heart is pumping around the body each minute and on a heartbeat to heartbeat basis and other parameters that can tell the doctor if the patient will benefit from specific treatments. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of these devices. This knowledge will help us understand how investigators can use such non-invasive devices to care for patients at less risk than the devices currently used for such purposes.
The main question the study aims to answer is:
• What monitor is the most accurate in capturing non-invasive patient data?
These devices are the ClearSight (Edwards Life Sciences), CareTaker (CareTaker Medical) and CNAP (CNS Systems). These devices measure blood pressure, how much blood the heart is pumping around the body each minute and on a heartbeat to heartbeat basis and other parameters that can tell the doctor if the patient will benefit from specific treatments. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of these devices. This knowledge will help us understand how investigators can use such non-invasive devices to care for patients at less risk than the devices currently used for such purposes.
The main question the study aims to answer is:
• What monitor is the most accurate in capturing non-invasive patient data?
Detailed Description:
Investigators will compare predictors of preload responsiveness, including pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), and arterial dynamic elastance (Eadyn) in all patients and estimates of cardiac output (CO) in patients with an indwelling pulmonary artery catheter. in 50 intensive care unit, intubated patients during the patient's normal course of treatment using their usually present invasive monitoring devices for the first 8 hours following cardiac surgery.
The primary goal of the study will be to compare PPV, SVV and Eadyn measured by the non-invasive monitors ClearSight, CareTaker and CNAP versus a reference standard that uses invasive arterial pressure waveform data, which in this case will be the LiDCO monitor \& FloTrac monitor. Investigators will calculate accuracy, precision and concordance of each of the parameters measured during steady state conditions and after specific interventions including the administration of crystalloid fluid boluses and changes in vasoactive or inotropic medications. As a secondary objective, investigators will compare measures of CO by the same non-invasive monitors with the pulmonary artery catheter as a reference standard during the same conditions as above (i.e., steady state conditions, and before/after interventions). CO will therefore be only compared in patients that have a pulmonary artery catheter in place.
The primary goal of the study will be to compare PPV, SVV and Eadyn measured by the non-invasive monitors ClearSight, CareTaker and CNAP versus a reference standard that uses invasive arterial pressure waveform data, which in this case will be the LiDCO monitor \& FloTrac monitor. Investigators will calculate accuracy, precision and concordance of each of the parameters measured during steady state conditions and after specific interventions including the administration of crystalloid fluid boluses and changes in vasoactive or inotropic medications. As a secondary objective, investigators will compare measures of CO by the same non-invasive monitors with the pulmonary artery catheter as a reference standard during the same conditions as above (i.e., steady state conditions, and before/after interventions). CO will therefore be only compared in patients that have a pulmonary artery catheter in place.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HT9425-24-C-0121 | OTHER_GRANT | Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) | View |