Viewing Study NCT06841432


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 9:25 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-02 @ 2:29 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT06841432
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2025-02-24
First Post: 2025-02-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy
Sponsor: Al-Azhar University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Endoscopic Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy: Randomized Clinical Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2025-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical procedures in endoscopic adenoidectomy including Coblation and Suction diathermy

. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Coblation device have less time, less pain, less postoperative crustation and bad odor, less intraoperative bleeding, and less recurrence?

Participants will:

will undergo both procedures every day for 6 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: