Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:23 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 7:09 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03482232
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-04-03
First Post:
2018-03-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Consequences of Doing What Should Not be Done in Primary Care
Sponsor:
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Consequences of Doing What Should Not be Done in Primary Care
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
SOBRINA
Brief Summary:
Retrospective observational study in a random selection of 5% of digital records active between 2014 and 2017 to quantify the frequency of Do not do primary care recommendations, calculating the over-cost related to them and study reviewing a random selection of cases previously identified to determine whether patient suffered adverse events and their over-cost.
Detailed Description:
Basement: Overuse subjected patients to unnecessary risk without promoting a sufficient clinical benefit and over-cost. The Less is More Medicine movement has led to the identification of Do not do in different specialties, also in primary care.
Objective: To analyze the impact of errors (overuse rates based in Do not do recommendations) in clinical practice.
Method: Retrospective observational study in a random selection of 5% of digital records active between 2014 and 2017 to quantify the frequency of Do not do primary care recommendations, calculating the over-cost related to them. Retrospective study reviewing a random selection of cases previously identified to determine whether patient suffered adverse events and their over-cost.
Setting. Primary care in Andalucía, Aragón, Castilla La Mancha, Comunidad Valenciana, Madrid, Murcia, Navarra y País Vasco, eight autonomous communities in Spain.
Objective: To analyze the impact of errors (overuse rates based in Do not do recommendations) in clinical practice.
Method: Retrospective observational study in a random selection of 5% of digital records active between 2014 and 2017 to quantify the frequency of Do not do primary care recommendations, calculating the over-cost related to them. Retrospective study reviewing a random selection of cases previously identified to determine whether patient suffered adverse events and their over-cost.
Setting. Primary care in Andalucía, Aragón, Castilla La Mancha, Comunidad Valenciana, Madrid, Murcia, Navarra y País Vasco, eight autonomous communities in Spain.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: