Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 7:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03541304
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-04-14
First Post:
2018-05-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
High Dose Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Sponsor:
Sun Yat-sen University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy and Toxicity of High Dose Radiotherapy Wich Concurrent Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
While surgery remains the standard treatment for rectal cancer, some patients still firmly refuse surgery for various reasons. Here, we conducted this retrospective observation study to discuss the feasibility of high-dose radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in treating rectal cancer We retrospectively collect data of rectal cancer patients who were treated with high-dose radiotherapy plus chemotherapy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from April 1st, 2006 to July 30th, 2017. Patients gave up surgery before any treatment would have received one course of high dose radiotherapy (GTV60-70Gy/30-35f). Patients with tumor residual after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy but insisted non-operative treatment would have received 2 courses of radiotherapy (1st: GTV 45-50Gy/25f, 2nd: GTV 30/15f). The chemotherapy regimens included Capox, FOLFOX, or capecitabine at the discretion of the treating physician.
After treatment, patients were followed every 3 months for the first two years, at least every 6 months in the year thereafter. Recurrence, early and late toxicity were recorded.
Analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Local recurrence and distant metastasis rate, progression free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan Meier Method and were compared by log-rank test.
After treatment, patients were followed every 3 months for the first two years, at least every 6 months in the year thereafter. Recurrence, early and late toxicity were recorded.
Analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Local recurrence and distant metastasis rate, progression free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan Meier Method and were compared by log-rank test.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: