Viewing Study NCT05977361


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 1:06 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-30 @ 8:37 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05977361
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-04-25
First Post: 2023-07-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Intrathecal Catheter Placement Versus Resiting Epidural Catheter After Dural Puncture in Obstetric Patients
Sponsor: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Intrathecal Catheter Placement Versus Resiting Epidural Catheter After Dural Puncture in Obstetric Patients: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: ItaREVI
Brief Summary: Epidural anesthesia represents the most popular method for pain relief during labour. Unintentional dural puncture (UDP) occurs in 0.4-1.5% of labour epidural analgesia, representing therefore the most common complication. Up to 80% of patients with a UDP may develop a post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

When a UDP occurs, two possible strategies have been proposed in order to ensure analgesia during labour: either resiting the epidural catheter in a different intervertebral space, or inserting an intrathecal catheter. Both strategies proved to equally provide analgesia during labour, but their relative contribution in preventing PDPH is still not known.

The primary aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial is therefore to compare these two strategies in the occurrence of PDPH at 24 hours from the UDP.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: