Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:07 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 6:37 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06137404
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted:
2025-04-01
First Post:
2023-10-29
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Comparison of Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint With Relative Motion Extension Splint for Trigger Finger
Sponsor:
Waikato Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Comparison of Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint With Relative Motion Extension Splint for Trigger Finger
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date:
2025-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of two splint designs in conservative management of trigger finger.
Detailed Description:
This study aims to analyse and compare the effectiveness of metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint versus relative motion extension splint for trigger finger. This will help us find out which one of the two splint designs is more effective in the management of trigger finger, thus improving treatment outcomes for patients with trigger finger.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: