Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 8:03 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 5:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07196904
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-10-01
First Post:
2025-09-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ultrasonic vs Rotary Instruments in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: Clinical and Salivary CRP Outcomes
Sponsor:
Le Huynh Thien An
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Device in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: Assessment Through Clinical Indices and Salivary C-reactive Protein Levels
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PiezoCRP
Brief Summary:
In the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars, ultrasonic surgical devices (piezosurgery) have been introduced with the expectation of reducing postoperative complications such as swelling, pain, and trismus, compared with conventional rotary instruments. To objectively evaluate the postoperative inflammatory response, salivary high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a reliable biomarker of acute inflammation, will also be measured.
This randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasonic surgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. The study has two primary objectives:
* To compare clinical outcomes, including swelling, mouth opening limitation, and pain, on postoperative days 2 and 5 between the two surgical methods.
* To assess changes in salivary hsCRP levels by comparing preoperative baseline values with postoperative day 2 values, and to determine differences between the two surgical techniques.
A total of 22 patients indicated for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar extractions of similar difficulty will be enrolled. Each patient will undergo one extraction using ultrasonic surgery and the contralateral extraction using rotary instruments, in a randomized split-mouth design.
Pain and swelling will be assessed on postoperative days 2 and 5. Saliva samples will be collected preoperatively and on postoperative day 2 for hsCRP analysis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The hypothesis is that ultrasonic surgery will result in reduced pain, swelling, and limitation of mouth opening, as well as lower salivary hsCRP levels, compared with conventional rotary instruments. Findings from this study may provide scientific evidence supporting the use of ultrasonic devices to improve patient outcomes and may highlight the role of salivary hsCRP as a non-invasive biomarker for monitoring inflammation after oral surgery.
This randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasonic surgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. The study has two primary objectives:
* To compare clinical outcomes, including swelling, mouth opening limitation, and pain, on postoperative days 2 and 5 between the two surgical methods.
* To assess changes in salivary hsCRP levels by comparing preoperative baseline values with postoperative day 2 values, and to determine differences between the two surgical techniques.
A total of 22 patients indicated for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar extractions of similar difficulty will be enrolled. Each patient will undergo one extraction using ultrasonic surgery and the contralateral extraction using rotary instruments, in a randomized split-mouth design.
Pain and swelling will be assessed on postoperative days 2 and 5. Saliva samples will be collected preoperatively and on postoperative day 2 for hsCRP analysis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The hypothesis is that ultrasonic surgery will result in reduced pain, swelling, and limitation of mouth opening, as well as lower salivary hsCRP levels, compared with conventional rotary instruments. Findings from this study may provide scientific evidence supporting the use of ultrasonic devices to improve patient outcomes and may highlight the role of salivary hsCRP as a non-invasive biomarker for monitoring inflammation after oral surgery.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1428/ĐHYD-HĐĐĐ | OTHER | Institutional Review Board, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City | View |