Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 8:02 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 5:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07190404
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-24
First Post:
2025-09-09
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Multicontext Approach for Cognitive Function in Parkinson Disease
Sponsor:
Washington University School of Medicine
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy and Mechanisms of a Metacognitive Strategy Intervention for Parkinson Disease-Related Cognitive Decline.
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
MC4PD R01
Brief Summary:
Mild cognitive decline is common in early Parkinson disease (PD) and is associated with disability, reduced quality of life (QOL), and increased risk for dementia. Medical treatments for PD do not prevent or treat cognitive decline and may even exacerbate the problem.
Unfortunately, existing cognitive interventions for PD, which focus on restoring deficient cognitive skills through cognitive training (repetitive practice of tasks that challenge specific cognitive skills), provide limited benefit for daily function and QOL. To overcome this limitation, the investigators use strategy training. the investigators help people develop targeted strategies to use in everyday life to circumvent cognitive deficits and accomplish daily activities. Contemporary cognitive rehabilitation evidence supports strategy training for other neurological conditions and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but it has not been well-studied in PD. By teaching strategies for everyday cognition, the investigators hypothesize that our interventions will improve functional outcomes for people with PD.
Study participants will complete a baseline cognitive testing session, 10 cognitive treatment sessions with a trained occupational therapist, then have follow-up visits with the study team at 1-week, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months after completing the study intervention.
Unfortunately, existing cognitive interventions for PD, which focus on restoring deficient cognitive skills through cognitive training (repetitive practice of tasks that challenge specific cognitive skills), provide limited benefit for daily function and QOL. To overcome this limitation, the investigators use strategy training. the investigators help people develop targeted strategies to use in everyday life to circumvent cognitive deficits and accomplish daily activities. Contemporary cognitive rehabilitation evidence supports strategy training for other neurological conditions and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but it has not been well-studied in PD. By teaching strategies for everyday cognition, the investigators hypothesize that our interventions will improve functional outcomes for people with PD.
Study participants will complete a baseline cognitive testing session, 10 cognitive treatment sessions with a trained occupational therapist, then have follow-up visits with the study team at 1-week, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months after completing the study intervention.
Detailed Description:
Mild cognitive decline is common in early Parkinson disease (PD) and is associated with disability, reduced quality of life (QOL), and increased risk for dementia. Medical treatments for PD do not prevent or treat cognitive decline and may even exacerbate the problem. Therefore, behavioral interventions that attenuate its negative functional consequences and thus potentially delay dementia onset are a top research priority. Unfortunately, existing cognitive interventions for PD, which focus on restoring deficient cognitive skills through cognitive training (repetitive practice of tasks that challenge specific cognitive skills), provide limited benefit for daily function and QOL. To overcome this limitation, the investigators use strategy training. the investigators help people develop targeted strategies to use in everyday life to circumvent cognitive deficits and accomplish daily activities. Contemporary cognitive rehabilitation evidence supports strategy training for other neurological conditions and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but it has not been well-studied in PD. By teaching strategies for everyday cognition, the investigators hypothesize that our interventions will improve functional outcomes for people with PD.
Specifically, the investigators use the Multicontext (MC) Approach to support daily cognitive function in people with PD with mild cognitive decline. The MC Approach is a metacognitive strategy intervention that targets awareness, strategy use, and self-efficacy to improve functional cognitive performance in daily life. Through therapist- mediated experiences with cognitively challenging functional activities, participants develop personalized strategies (e.g., self-talk, planning, checklists) to prevent or correct cognitive performance errors. The goal is to enable people to manage everyday cognitive challenges so they can perform and participate in meaningful activities and roles. In a development and proof-of-concept study, the investigators adapted and refined the treatment protocol and training materials, established good participant acceptance, and provided preliminary data on its benefits for daily cognitive function. In a subsequent pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial (R21AG063974), the investigators established trial feasibility and treatment fidelity and generated promising treatment effect data. Notably, the MC Approach produced clinically meaningful improvements in daily cognitive function that were larger than that of the cognitive task training control and that were maintained 3 and possibly 12 months post treatment. the investigators now have the experience, methods, and data to justify and prepare us for a full-scale efficacy trial.
The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the short- and long-term efficacy of the MC Approach for improving daily cognitive function in people with PD with mild cognitive decline. Secondarily, the investigators will examine whether booster treatment enhances treatment effects and explore the cognitive-behavioral mechanisms of the MC Approach. PD participants (N=114) will complete baseline assessment, randomization to treatment group (MC n=76, Control n=38), 10 treatment sessions (1x/week), and 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post treatment assessment. MC participants will then be randomized to a booster (MC+B n=38) or no-booster (MC n=38) condition, and the MC+B group will receive booster treatment within the following month. Then all three groups (Control, MC, MC+B) will complete 12-month assessment. Mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to compare change across treatment groups and over time.
Our primary study aims and hypotheses are:
Aim 1: Determine the effect of the MC Approach on daily cognitive function. H1: The MC group will report greater improvements in daily cognitive function than the Control group 1 week (H1a; short-term) and 12 months (H1b; long-term) post treatment. Participants will rate their performance on personalized functional cognitive goals using a standardized cognitive rehabilitation tool (primary outcome: Bangor Goal Setting Interview, (BGSI) at each testing timepoint. Primary analyses will include the 1-week and 12-month data for Control and MC participants; additional analyses can look at trajectories across all timepoints.
Aim 2: Examine the effect of booster MC Approach treatment on daily cognitive function.
H2: The MC+B group will report better daily cognitive function 12 months post initial treatment than the MC group. At 6 months post, MC+B participants will receive two booster treatment sessions to review and reinforce their learning and strategy use. Primary analyses will include the 6- and 12-month BGSI data, controlling for baseline.
Aim 3: Explore the effect of the MC Approach on the theorized intermediate treatment targets.
H3: The MC group will have greater improvements in awareness, strategy use, and self-efficacy than the Control group after treatment. Participants will complete measures of awareness, strategy use, and self-efficacy at each testing timepoint. Primary analyses will include all available timepoints. To further explore mechanisms of action, correlational analyses will examine if change in the targets relates to change in functional outcomes.
Specifically, the investigators use the Multicontext (MC) Approach to support daily cognitive function in people with PD with mild cognitive decline. The MC Approach is a metacognitive strategy intervention that targets awareness, strategy use, and self-efficacy to improve functional cognitive performance in daily life. Through therapist- mediated experiences with cognitively challenging functional activities, participants develop personalized strategies (e.g., self-talk, planning, checklists) to prevent or correct cognitive performance errors. The goal is to enable people to manage everyday cognitive challenges so they can perform and participate in meaningful activities and roles. In a development and proof-of-concept study, the investigators adapted and refined the treatment protocol and training materials, established good participant acceptance, and provided preliminary data on its benefits for daily cognitive function. In a subsequent pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial (R21AG063974), the investigators established trial feasibility and treatment fidelity and generated promising treatment effect data. Notably, the MC Approach produced clinically meaningful improvements in daily cognitive function that were larger than that of the cognitive task training control and that were maintained 3 and possibly 12 months post treatment. the investigators now have the experience, methods, and data to justify and prepare us for a full-scale efficacy trial.
The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the short- and long-term efficacy of the MC Approach for improving daily cognitive function in people with PD with mild cognitive decline. Secondarily, the investigators will examine whether booster treatment enhances treatment effects and explore the cognitive-behavioral mechanisms of the MC Approach. PD participants (N=114) will complete baseline assessment, randomization to treatment group (MC n=76, Control n=38), 10 treatment sessions (1x/week), and 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post treatment assessment. MC participants will then be randomized to a booster (MC+B n=38) or no-booster (MC n=38) condition, and the MC+B group will receive booster treatment within the following month. Then all three groups (Control, MC, MC+B) will complete 12-month assessment. Mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to compare change across treatment groups and over time.
Our primary study aims and hypotheses are:
Aim 1: Determine the effect of the MC Approach on daily cognitive function. H1: The MC group will report greater improvements in daily cognitive function than the Control group 1 week (H1a; short-term) and 12 months (H1b; long-term) post treatment. Participants will rate their performance on personalized functional cognitive goals using a standardized cognitive rehabilitation tool (primary outcome: Bangor Goal Setting Interview, (BGSI) at each testing timepoint. Primary analyses will include the 1-week and 12-month data for Control and MC participants; additional analyses can look at trajectories across all timepoints.
Aim 2: Examine the effect of booster MC Approach treatment on daily cognitive function.
H2: The MC+B group will report better daily cognitive function 12 months post initial treatment than the MC group. At 6 months post, MC+B participants will receive two booster treatment sessions to review and reinforce their learning and strategy use. Primary analyses will include the 6- and 12-month BGSI data, controlling for baseline.
Aim 3: Explore the effect of the MC Approach on the theorized intermediate treatment targets.
H3: The MC group will have greater improvements in awareness, strategy use, and self-efficacy than the Control group after treatment. Participants will complete measures of awareness, strategy use, and self-efficacy at each testing timepoint. Primary analyses will include all available timepoints. To further explore mechanisms of action, correlational analyses will examine if change in the targets relates to change in functional outcomes.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: