Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 8:01 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 2:34 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05127304
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-11-13
First Post:
2021-11-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
A Study Using US Medical and Pharmacy Claim Records to Compare the Resource Use, Cost, and Outcomes of People With COPD Who Take Either Tiotropium + Olodaterol or Fluticasone + Umeclidinium + Vilanterol
Sponsor:
Boehringer Ingelheim
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Health Care Resource Utilization, Cost and Other Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With COPD Initiating Tiotropium Bromide/Olodaterol Versus Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to estimate disease-related and all-cause burden and clinical outcomes of interest following initiation of chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) maintenance therapy with Tiotropium Bromide/Olodaterol (TIO/OLO) or Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI).
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: