Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:52 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 12:53 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05510804
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-08-22
First Post:
2021-12-07
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy of an App-based CBT Featuring Virtual Reality for Anxiety Disorders
Sponsor:
Bartosz of Zurowski
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ambulante Leitlinienkonforme Intervention im Selbstmanagement für Angststörungen (ALISA)
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-08
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
ALISA
Brief Summary:
Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of a (minimally) therapist-guided app-based psychotherapy with virtual reality exposure therapy (ALISA) in participants with agoraphobia with or without panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or panic disorder. Participants are diagnosed applying a structured clinical interview by qualified psychologists and then they are randomly allocated to either the intervention group (ALISA) or a control group, receiving supportive psychotherapy while on a waiting list for a structured therapy programme. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving ALISA compared to controls will present lower levels of anxiety and a higher quality of life at six-month follow-up after start of the intervention, according to Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, primary outcome measure) and WHO-QoL, respectively.
Detailed Description:
Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of a (minimally) therapist-guided app-based psychotherapy with virtual reality exposure therapy (ALISA) in participants with agoraphobia (with or without panic disorder), social anxiety disorder or panic disorder. The intervention has been developed by Sympatient GmbH in cooperation with the University of Luebeck, Dept. of Psychiatry. It consists of scheduled therapist assistance, a smartphone-based application consisting of eight CBT-based courses including instructive therapist videos, questionnaires and VR exposure scenarios presented via VR goggles as well as interoceptive exposures.
Participants are diagnosed according to a structured clinical interview (SCID) by experienced and trained clinical psychologists. Then they are randomly allocated to either the intervention group (ALISA) or a control group offered supportive psychotherapy while being on a waiting list for a structured therapy programme of an outpatient unit for patients with anxiety disorders. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving ALISA - as compared to controls - will present lower levels of anxiety and a higher quality of life at 6-month follow-up after start of the intervention, according to Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, primary outcome measure) and WHO-QoL (L-1), respectively. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that the reduction of anxiety (ANOVA; group x time) can be shown at 1-year follow up. The investigators expect ALISA to be effective in each of the three disorder-specific therapy schedules (social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia w/without panic disorder). Therefore, disorder-specific symptom scales have been additionally adopted: Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) and Liebowitz Social Phobia Scale. Co-morbid depression and global functioning will be assessed using CGI and GAF as secondary outcome measures, respectively.
The allocation to the groups was conducted on the basis of random numbers generated by Microsoft Excel 2013 and with the restriction that the ratio of intervention to control group participants was 2:1. This unequal randomization was chosen for ethical reasons including a more reliable assessment of adverse events in the intervention group with a higher power. A planned sample size of n = 41 for each of the three diagnoses in the intervention group and n = 21 for each of the three diagnoses in the control group was calculated to detect a significant difference with an effect size of Cohens´s d = 0.9 with a probability of 90% and α = 2.5. Adding an estimated dropout-rate of 20%, each diagnosis group should include n = 49 participants in the intervention group and n = 25 in the control group, resulting in a total of N = 222 participants. (Multiple) imputation will be applied to deal with missing data. Results of Intention to treat analyses and following per protocol analyses will be reported.
Using records of cooperating health insurances, a health economic analysis of the intervention will be performed. Given that patients with untreated anxiety disorders show a markedly increased use of health system, a successful reduction of anxiety, once proven, should have an impact on patient's use of the health system in general (exploratory analysis)
Participants are diagnosed according to a structured clinical interview (SCID) by experienced and trained clinical psychologists. Then they are randomly allocated to either the intervention group (ALISA) or a control group offered supportive psychotherapy while being on a waiting list for a structured therapy programme of an outpatient unit for patients with anxiety disorders. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving ALISA - as compared to controls - will present lower levels of anxiety and a higher quality of life at 6-month follow-up after start of the intervention, according to Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, primary outcome measure) and WHO-QoL (L-1), respectively. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that the reduction of anxiety (ANOVA; group x time) can be shown at 1-year follow up. The investigators expect ALISA to be effective in each of the three disorder-specific therapy schedules (social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia w/without panic disorder). Therefore, disorder-specific symptom scales have been additionally adopted: Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) and Liebowitz Social Phobia Scale. Co-morbid depression and global functioning will be assessed using CGI and GAF as secondary outcome measures, respectively.
The allocation to the groups was conducted on the basis of random numbers generated by Microsoft Excel 2013 and with the restriction that the ratio of intervention to control group participants was 2:1. This unequal randomization was chosen for ethical reasons including a more reliable assessment of adverse events in the intervention group with a higher power. A planned sample size of n = 41 for each of the three diagnoses in the intervention group and n = 21 for each of the three diagnoses in the control group was calculated to detect a significant difference with an effect size of Cohens´s d = 0.9 with a probability of 90% and α = 2.5. Adding an estimated dropout-rate of 20%, each diagnosis group should include n = 49 participants in the intervention group and n = 25 in the control group, resulting in a total of N = 222 participants. (Multiple) imputation will be applied to deal with missing data. Results of Intention to treat analyses and following per protocol analyses will be reported.
Using records of cooperating health insurances, a health economic analysis of the intervention will be performed. Given that patients with untreated anxiety disorders show a markedly increased use of health system, a successful reduction of anxiety, once proven, should have an impact on patient's use of the health system in general (exploratory analysis)
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: