Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06650657
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-10-18
Brief Title:
The Effect of Touchpoint Method on Clinical Learning Experience With Nursing Students
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Effect of Touchpoint Method on Clinical Learning
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This research aims to evaluate the effect of Touchpoint experience as a clinical learning method on clinical learning The research is a quasi-experimental research with experimental-control groups Students will be divided into experimental and control groups with the simple randomization method A pre-test will be taken with data collection tools before the study for both groups Students in the control group will continue their routine practice experiences A post-test will be applied with data collection tools at the end of the 8-week internship period TouchPoint is planned as a 2-session experience over a semester Session 1 focuses on patient-centered care Session 2 focuses on teamwork and collaboration The method of both sessions will be conducted by 2 researchers with a small clinical group of 8 to 10 students Sessions will last from 15 hours to 2 hours depending on the number of students and the degree of discussion Sessions will be conducted face-to-face in a classroom
Detailed Description:
Outcome Measures
Clinical Learning Climate Scale This measurement tool used in the study was developed by Demiral Yılmaz 2010 This scale consists of 36 items Demir Yılmaz 2010 The scale is scored using a 5-point Likert scale I completely disagree 1 - I completely agree 5 Three dimensions are defined in the factor analysis of the scale These dimensions are clinical environment emotional climate and motivation
Student Satisfaction Scale-Short Form SSS-SF is the shortened and revised version of the Student Satisfaction Scale developed by Baykal et al to determine the satisfaction of students studying at nursing schools by Baykal et al in 2011 In the evaluation of the 53 items in the scale a five-point Likert-type measurement is used including 5-Strongly agree 4- Agree 3-Undecided 2-Disagree 1-Strongly disagree As the average score approaches 1 in the scale as a whole and in the sub-dimensions the student is considered to be dissatisfied and as the score approaches 5 the student is considered to be satisfied The scale was found to be highly reliable with a Cronbachs alpha coefficient of 097 in total The scale has 5 sub-dimensions namely faculty members school administration participation in decisions scientific social and technical opportunities and quality of education The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 265 and the lowest score is 53 As the average score on the scale as a whole and in the sub-dimensions approaches 1 the student is considered to be insatiable and as the score approaches 5 the student is considered to be satisfied
Eligibility Criteria Being a 2nd year student at the Faculty of Nursing Agreeing to participate in the research
Clinical Learning Climate Scale This measurement tool used in the study was developed by Demiral Yılmaz 2010 This scale consists of 36 items Demir Yılmaz 2010 The scale is scored using a 5-point Likert scale I completely disagree 1 - I completely agree 5 Three dimensions are defined in the factor analysis of the scale These dimensions are clinical environment emotional climate and motivation
Student Satisfaction Scale-Short Form SSS-SF is the shortened and revised version of the Student Satisfaction Scale developed by Baykal et al to determine the satisfaction of students studying at nursing schools by Baykal et al in 2011 In the evaluation of the 53 items in the scale a five-point Likert-type measurement is used including 5-Strongly agree 4- Agree 3-Undecided 2-Disagree 1-Strongly disagree As the average score approaches 1 in the scale as a whole and in the sub-dimensions the student is considered to be dissatisfied and as the score approaches 5 the student is considered to be satisfied The scale was found to be highly reliable with a Cronbachs alpha coefficient of 097 in total The scale has 5 sub-dimensions namely faculty members school administration participation in decisions scientific social and technical opportunities and quality of education The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 265 and the lowest score is 53 As the average score on the scale as a whole and in the sub-dimensions approaches 1 the student is considered to be insatiable and as the score approaches 5 the student is considered to be satisfied
Eligibility Criteria Being a 2nd year student at the Faculty of Nursing Agreeing to participate in the research
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None