Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:42 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:42 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06630819
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-09-24
Brief Title:
Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing the Effectiveness of Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction of Mandibular Posterior Teeth- a Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth One group receives buccal infiltration of 18 ml of 4 Articaine and the other group receives buccal infiltration of 36 ml of 4 Articaine
Detailed Description:
The most widely and commonly used injection method for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth is the inferior alveolar nerve block IANB technique However various complications like pain during injection transient facial nerve paralysis trismus hematoma and paresthesia are associated with the inferior alveolar nerve block technique
Local infiltration technique has been proven as a safer and less painful anesthetic injection technique compared to IANB Unfortunately the dense nature of cortical bone in the mandibular posterior region hinders sufficient diffusion of anesthetic solution during infiltration Thus to achieve an adequate anesthesia for a painless dental extraction of mandibular posterior teeth by infiltration technique a strong and effective local anesthetic agent having a deeper penetrating property should be used
Articaine is one of the most widely used local anesthetic agents It is more potent and has shown more success rate than Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in providing anesthesia in mandibular and maxillary posterior teeth by buccal infiltration diffusibility
This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth
Local infiltration technique has been proven as a safer and less painful anesthetic injection technique compared to IANB Unfortunately the dense nature of cortical bone in the mandibular posterior region hinders sufficient diffusion of anesthetic solution during infiltration Thus to achieve an adequate anesthesia for a painless dental extraction of mandibular posterior teeth by infiltration technique a strong and effective local anesthetic agent having a deeper penetrating property should be used
Articaine is one of the most widely used local anesthetic agents It is more potent and has shown more success rate than Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in providing anesthesia in mandibular and maxillary posterior teeth by buccal infiltration diffusibility
This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None