Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:40 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:40 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06602505
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-09-15
Brief Title:
Comparative Analysis of Incidence of Newly Developed Postoperative Low Back Pain with Field Block Versus Without Field-block Before Spinal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Caesarean Sections
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Analysis of Incidence of Newly Developed Postoperative Low Back Pain with Field Block Versus Without Field-block Before Spinal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Caesarean Sections
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of field block in preventing postoperative low back pain PDPB in patients undergoing Cesarean Sections
Detailed Description:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of field block with lidocaine 2 5 ml administered with a 24G hypodermic needle before spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing LSCS in preventing the development of postoperative low back pain PDPB The study aimed to determine if using a field block would decrease the incidence of PDPB compared to patients who received only spinal anesthesia
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None