Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:39 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:39 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06589622
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-09-06
Brief Title:
Major Failure Rate Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Techniques Versus Hall Technique in the Management of Decayed Primary Molars in Children Aged 4-6 Years Old
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Major Failures of Hall Technique Versus Atraumatic Restorative Technique in the Management of Carious Primary Molars Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study is designed to compare major failure rate between ART excavation of caries with hand instruments and placing glass ionomer restoration without the use of rotary instruments versus hall technique placing a stainless steel crown on the decayed primary molar without prepartion or caries removal
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None