Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06561204
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-16
Brief Title:
Full-mouth Electronic Toothbrush Vs Conventional Electronic Toothbrush
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Impact of a Full-mouth Electronic Toothbrush on Indicators of Gingivitis and Patient Perceptions a Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this randomized masked-examiner clinical trial is to investigate a full-mouth electronic toothbrush FMET The three arms are 1 FMET American Dental Association ADA approved dentifrice 2 conventional electronic toothbrush ETB ADA dentifrice and 3 FMET foam system
Detailed Description:
The primary purpose is to compare the FMET ADA dentifrice to the conventional ETB ADA dentifrice The exploratory aim is to compare the FMET foam system to both the FMET ADA dentifrice and conventional ETB ADA dentifrice Baseline and 30-day outcome measures will be collected to evaluate the impact on clinical indicators of gingivitis plaque and patient perceptions
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None