Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06560515
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-15
Brief Title:
Dinoprostone Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Post-dated Pregnancy a Randomized Controlled Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled study was carried out on 370 pregnant women with gestational age 40 weeks of different ages and parities at El-Shatby Maternity University Hospital after approval of ethical committee of Alexandria Faculty of Medicine After assessment for eligibility enrollment in the study women were randomly assigned into one of the two study groups Group I received 3 mg vaginal Dinoprostone of maximum 2 doses 6 hours apart and Group II received 50 μg of vaginal misoprostol of maximum 2 doses 6 hours apart
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None