Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:37 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:37 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06553677
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-11
Brief Title:
Clinical Evaluation of Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap vs Coronally Advanced Flap With Graft for Gingival Recession
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Clinical Evaluation of Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap TCAF Versus Coronally Advanced Flap CAF Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession Sites A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate gingival recession depth reduction using tunneled coronally advanced flap compared to coronally advanced flap both combined with connective tissue graft in patients with isolated RT2 gingival recession sites
Detailed Description:
Gingival recession can cause clinical conditions that could be of main concern for patients Techniques aiming for coverage of the gingival recession aim to address dentin hypersensitivity non-carious cervical lesions NCCLs and enhance patients esthetics Cortellini Bissada 2018 Mid-buccal gingival recessions have been associated with patients esthetic discomfort Zucchelli Mounssif 2015 Most of the studies in the literature focus on the treatment of RT1 recession as they have the most favorable prognosis of full root coverage Barootchi et al 2020 Despite most studies focusing their attention on RT1 cases RT2 defects are found to be the most prevalent type with 888 among patients according to Romandini et al 2020
The coronally advanced flap and the tunneling technique are the most commonly performed surgical approaches for treating gingival recessions However these two approaches have commonly been regarded as alternatives to each other with clinicians choosing to perform only one of them during root coverage procedures
Barootchi Tavelli 2022 aimed in his conducted case series to designate a surgical technique to treat isolated RT2 gingival recession defects in which he was trying to achieve and combine the advantage of both better access and graft stabilization in CAF and the preservation of the integrity of the papilla and better blood supply to the graft present in tunneling technique The study concluded that the combination of both techniques in the same surgical design can have the potential to enhance flap and graft vascularization and improve clinical esthetic and patient-reported outcomes To our knowledge there is no conducted randomized clinical trials comparing the tunneled coronally advanced flap technique to the coronally advanced flap for gingival depth reduction
So this clinical trial aims to address this gap of the literature
The coronally advanced flap and the tunneling technique are the most commonly performed surgical approaches for treating gingival recessions However these two approaches have commonly been regarded as alternatives to each other with clinicians choosing to perform only one of them during root coverage procedures
Barootchi Tavelli 2022 aimed in his conducted case series to designate a surgical technique to treat isolated RT2 gingival recession defects in which he was trying to achieve and combine the advantage of both better access and graft stabilization in CAF and the preservation of the integrity of the papilla and better blood supply to the graft present in tunneling technique The study concluded that the combination of both techniques in the same surgical design can have the potential to enhance flap and graft vascularization and improve clinical esthetic and patient-reported outcomes To our knowledge there is no conducted randomized clinical trials comparing the tunneled coronally advanced flap technique to the coronally advanced flap for gingival depth reduction
So this clinical trial aims to address this gap of the literature
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None