Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:36 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06524219
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-07-17
Brief Title:
Comparison of Nerve-sparing Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy for Oncological Outcome and Functional Recovery
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Prospective Multi-center Real-world Study on the Comparison of Different Nerve-sparing Techniques in Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Oncological Outcome and Functional Recovery
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To evaluate the difference among three nerve-sparing techniquesunilateral intrafascial resection bilateral intrafascial resection bilateral extrafascial resection of oncological outcome and functional recovery
Detailed Description:
Surgery is a common and effective treatment for localized prostate cancer The main objective of surgical treatment is to remove the tumor completely in order to achieve the goal of cure Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is a radical resection of prostate cancer with minimal damage to the nerves and blood vessels
There are nerves around the prostate that affect sexual function and damage to these nerves can lead to complications like sexual dysfunction and incontinence Therefore how to completely remove the tumor as far as possible to preserve these nerves become an important issue in the surgical treatment
This study is aim to evaluate the different among nerve-sparing strategies including unilateral intrafascial resection bilateral intrafascial resection and bilateral extrafascial resection on oncological outcome and functional recovery so as to provide clinical evidence for nerve-sparing surgery of prostate cancer via robot-assisted posterior approach
There are nerves around the prostate that affect sexual function and damage to these nerves can lead to complications like sexual dysfunction and incontinence Therefore how to completely remove the tumor as far as possible to preserve these nerves become an important issue in the surgical treatment
This study is aim to evaluate the different among nerve-sparing strategies including unilateral intrafascial resection bilateral intrafascial resection and bilateral extrafascial resection on oncological outcome and functional recovery so as to provide clinical evidence for nerve-sparing surgery of prostate cancer via robot-assisted posterior approach
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None