Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06517472
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-07-17
Brief Title:
Comparison of Pit Picking Phenol and Combined Pit Picking and Phenol Applications in Pilonidal Sinus Treatment
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Pit Picking Phenol and Combined Pit Picking and Phenol Applications in Pilonidal Sinus Treatment
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common condition and treatment options and outcomes vary greatly Chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease PSD primarily affects young adults and causes work loss In this study three treatment methods will be performed the minimally invasive pit-picking procedure crystallized phenol application CPT and a combined method minimally invasive pit-picking procedure and CPT The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these three methods evaluate short- and long-term results and determine treatment success the incidence of postoperative complications chronic pain levels recurrence rates and patient satisfaction Additionally the effects of these methods on hospital stay wound healing time and workforce loss will also be examined
Detailed Description:
Pilonidal sinus disease PSD is common affecting approximately 26 in 100000 people Treatment options and outcomes vary significantly Chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease primarily affects young adults and leads to substantial work loss Due to the heterogeneous nature of clinical presentations finding a single treatment approach for PSD has proven difficult Future clinical studies might benefit from focusing on the best management strategies rather than the best technique
Literature indicates that the minimally invasive pit-picking procedure has a general treatment success rate of 68 with low postoperative complication rates chronic pain and high patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic appearance It is seen as a better option in terms of pain wound healing time and complication rates For simple uncomplicated pilonidal sinus cases the pit-picking method is an alternative to flap surgery in terms of wound healing and recurrence
Particularly for patients with fewer than two pits and no lateral extensions crystallized phenol application CPT is a good alternative to modified Limberg flap surgery and other surgical procedures CPT being a minimally invasive procedure performed under local anesthesia has higher success rates after recurrent applications and shorter hospital stays Long-term results for CPT treatment are also quite successful Studies show that in addition to endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment crystallized phenol treatment is safe well-tolerated and provides quick and lasting recovery without recurrence over the follow-up period
The presented study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment methods for pilonidal sinus disease Pit Picking CPT Application and Combined Pit Picking and CPT Application The study will evaluate the short- and long-term results treatment success incidence of postoperative complications chronic pain levels recurrence rates and patient satisfaction Additionally the study will examine the effects of these methods on hospital stay wound healing time and workforce loss The presented study aims to determine whether minimally invasive procedures and CPT treatment offer better management strategies for pilonidal sinus disease The findings are expected to contribute to identifying the most suitable treatment method for pilonidal sinus disease
Literature indicates that the minimally invasive pit-picking procedure has a general treatment success rate of 68 with low postoperative complication rates chronic pain and high patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic appearance It is seen as a better option in terms of pain wound healing time and complication rates For simple uncomplicated pilonidal sinus cases the pit-picking method is an alternative to flap surgery in terms of wound healing and recurrence
Particularly for patients with fewer than two pits and no lateral extensions crystallized phenol application CPT is a good alternative to modified Limberg flap surgery and other surgical procedures CPT being a minimally invasive procedure performed under local anesthesia has higher success rates after recurrent applications and shorter hospital stays Long-term results for CPT treatment are also quite successful Studies show that in addition to endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment crystallized phenol treatment is safe well-tolerated and provides quick and lasting recovery without recurrence over the follow-up period
The presented study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment methods for pilonidal sinus disease Pit Picking CPT Application and Combined Pit Picking and CPT Application The study will evaluate the short- and long-term results treatment success incidence of postoperative complications chronic pain levels recurrence rates and patient satisfaction Additionally the study will examine the effects of these methods on hospital stay wound healing time and workforce loss The presented study aims to determine whether minimally invasive procedures and CPT treatment offer better management strategies for pilonidal sinus disease The findings are expected to contribute to identifying the most suitable treatment method for pilonidal sinus disease
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None