Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:48 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-05 @ 5:11 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01405703
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2015-07-09
First Post:
2011-07-27
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Percutaneous Versus Open Plate Fixation of Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures
Sponsor:
University of Utah
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Percutaneous Versus Open Plate Fixation of Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a prospective, level II evidence comparison between two cohorts. This study is designed to compare the percutaneous versus open approach for plate fixation of diaphyseal clavicle fractures. This study includes questionnaires and measurements that will collect data on incision-related numbness, union rates, overall outcomes, complication rates of the two methods, infection rates, and overall satisfaction. The surgical procedure, all radiographs and follow-up visits to a minimum of one year are the principle investigators (PI's) standard of care for this injury. Measurements and questionnaires are related to the study.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: